A STUDY ON INVESTOR AWARENESS AND PERCEPTION TOWARDS ALGORITHMIC TRADING IN GUJARAT
Keywords:
Algorithmic Trading, Investor Awareness, Investor Perception, Retail Investors, Gujarat, Stock MarketAbstract
Algorithmic trading accounts for a large share of the order flow on Indian stock exchanges, but many retail investors know little about how it works. This study examines the awareness and perception of investors towards algorithmic trading in Gujarat. The objectives were to measure the level of investor awareness towards algorithmic trading and to examine the relationship between investor awareness and perception. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. A sample of 150 investors was drawn from Ahmedabad, Surat, Vadodara and Rajkot by simple random sampling. The data were analysed using descriptive statistics, one-sample t test, independent samples t test, one-way ANOVA, chi-square test, Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. The results show that awareness of investors is at a moderate level (mean = 3.09), while their perception is favourable (mean = 3.48). Awareness differs significantly with investing experience, but not with gender, age or education. Awareness has a strong positive relationship with perception (r = 0.58, p < 0.001) and explains about 34 per cent of the variation in it. The study concludes that investor education by brokers, exchanges and regulators can raise awareness and support better informed views.
References
I. Irimia-Diéguez, A., Velicia-Martín, F., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2023). Predicting fintech innovation adoption: The mediator role of social norms and attitudes. Financial Innovation, 9(1), Article 36.
II. Nain, I., & Rajan, S. (2023). Algorithms for better decision-making: A qualitative study exploring the landscape of robo-advisors in India. Managerial Finance, 49(11), 1750–1761.
III. Rahat, U., Siddiqui, A. A., Pervez, K., & Hasan, M. (2023). Impediment in adaptation of algorithm trading: A case of frontier stock exchange. KIET Journal of Computing & Information Sciences, 6(2), 67–83.
IV. Bunkar, B., & Ramaiah, K. (2024). A serial mediation model for investigating the intention to use algorithmic trading platforms among retail investors in India. Vilakshan - XIMB Journal of Management, 21(2), 263–280.
V. Parveen, Kesharwani, S., Prakash, A., & Gangwar, J. D. (2024). Robo-advisors: Automated algorithm-driven wealth management services – A literature review. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 16(2), 91–99.
VI. Akhtar, F., Akhtar, S., & Laeeq, M. (2025). Evolution of robo-advisors: A literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49, Article e70131.
VII. Verma, B., Schulze, M., Goswami, D., & Upreti, K. (2025). Artificial intelligence attitudes and resistance to use robo-advisors: Exploring investor reluctance toward cognitive financial systems. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 1623534.
VIII. de Oliveira Santini, F., Hasan Jafar, S., Junior Ladeira, W., & Rasul, T. (2026). Drivers of robo-advisors adoption in financial services: A meta-analytical study. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 44, 439–453.
IX. Goswami, D., & Verma, B. (2026). Why investors resist: A psychological perspective on adoption resistance to financial robo-advisors. Journal of Internet Commerce, 25, 38–69.
X. Verma, B., Remer, L., Goswami, D., & Sinha, S. K. (2026). Assessing the utility of advanced adoption models for AI-based financial services: Insights into automated and hybrid robo-advisors. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 9, Article 1854196.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.