DEEP FAKES AND DIGITAL PERSONHOOD: A CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR IDENTITY PROTECTION IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE AI

Authors

  • Teena Lalchandbhai Taviyad LL.B, LL.M, UGC NET

Keywords:

Generative AI, Deepfakes, Digital Personhood, Article 21, BNSS 2023, Identity Protection

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of generative artificial intelligence and synthetic media has shifted legal challenges from informational data privacy to identity manipulation. Traditional legal frameworks predominantly treat digital impersonation through financial fraud or defamation lenses, leaving a critical vacuum in addressing non-economic harms caused by deepfakes. This research paper evaluates the constitutional and statutory necessity of safeguarding "digital personhood"—the unique, intangible representation of an individual in the virtual sphere. Adopting a doctrinal and analytical qualitative legal methodology, the study analyzes the constitutional guarantees under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, asserting that the right to dignity and personal liberty must encompass a fundamental "Right to Digital Bodily Integrity." Furthermore, the paper critiques the statutory limitations within the newly enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act, 2023, and highlights the evidentiary challenges presented by Section 61 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. The findings demonstrate that ad-hoc judicial remedies remain insufficient for ordinary citizens. Consequently, the paper recommends a comprehensive framework featuring statutory recognition of digital personhood, compulsory cryptographic AI watermarking, and standardized forensic verification protocols to protect human dignity in the generative AI era.

References

I. K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India, (2017) 10 SCC 1.

II. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248.

III. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, No. 45, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India).

IV. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, No. 46, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India).

V. Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, No. 22, Acts of Parliament, 2023 (India).

VI. Information Technology Act, 2000, No. 21, Acts of Parliament, 2000 (India).

VII. Gautam Bhatia, The Transformative Constitution: A Radical Biography in Nine Acts, HarperCollins India (2019).

VIII. Upendra Baxi, Human Rights in a Post-Human World: Critical Essays, Oxford University Press (2009).

IX. Deepa Varadarajan, A Personality Right for the Digital Age, 82 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1471 (2014).

X. Anil Kapoor v. Simply Life India & Ors., 2023 SCC OnLine Del 6914.

XI. Jaikishan Kakubhai Saraf v. The Peppy Store & Ors., 2024 SCC OnLine Del 3664.

XII. Ananth Padmanabhan, Digital Evidence in the Age of Synthetic Media, 15 Nat'l L. Sch. India Rev. 88 (2022).

Downloads

Published

01-09-2026

How to Cite

Teena Lalchandbhai Taviyad. (2026). DEEP FAKES AND DIGITAL PERSONHOOD: A CONSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR IDENTITY PROTECTION IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE AI. International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering, 9(09), 01–05. Retrieved from https://iejse.com/journals/index.php/iejse/article/view/440