BEYOND PATHOLOGIES: THE ROLE OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES IN CANCER PREVENTION AND TREATMENT IN HUMANS

Authors

  • Tara Bailkeri Research Scholars Program, Harvard Student Agencies, In collaboration with Learn with Leaders

Keywords:

Reactive Oxygen Species, Redox Window, Redox Homeostasis, Oxidative Stress, Mitochondria, Antioxidants, Tumorigenesis, Cancer Treatment, Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidants, Cell Signalling

Abstract

Traditionally associated with pathologies such as cardiovascular disease and ageing, Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) have been shown to have crucial roles in tumorigenesis and cancer stem cell longevity. The multifaceted roles of ROS in the cellular processes of cancer cells, including their dual, sometimes antithetical, roles in tumorigenesis and cancer therapy, are explored here. ROS are known to mutate or deactivate tumour suppressor genes and damage homeostatic proteins, resulting in tumours. The production, function, and regulation of ROS, particularly within the context of the redox window, are also discussed. With respect to cancer therapeutics, we go over the efficacy of conventional cancer treatments, which rely on ROS-mediated cytotoxic effects. The concentration-dependent functions of ROS open avenues for therapeutics since we can modulate ROS levels for cancer cell destruction while sparing healthy cells. Additionally, we emphasise the need for further research to fully comprehend the intricate roles of ROS in cancer. We advocate for continued research into ROS mechanisms and pathways to gauge the effectiveness of therapies, especially against cancer stem cells. Given the global impact of cancer, a better understanding of the cellular mechanisms of cancer is imperative for finding better treatments.

References

I. Patel, Roma H., et al. “Reactive Oxygen Species: The Good and the Bad.” InTech eBooks, 2018, doi:10.5772/intechopen.71547

II. Nakamura, Hajime, and Kohichi Takada. “Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer: Current Findings and Future Directions.” Cancer Science, vol. 112, no. 10, Wiley-Blackwell, Aug. 2021, pp. 3945–52, doi:10.1111/cas.15068

III. Bardaweel, Sanaa K., et al. “Reactive Oxygen Species: The Dual Role in Physiological and Pathological Conditions of the Human Body.” The Eurasian Journal of Medicine, vol. 50, no. 3, AVES, Nov. 2018, pp. 193–201, doi:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2018.17397

IV. Galadari, Sehamuddin, et al. “Reactive Oxygen Species and Cancer Paradox: To Promote or to Suppress?” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 104, Elsevier BV, Mar. 2017, pp. 144–64, doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2017.01.004

V. Yang, Haotian, et al. “The Role of Cellular Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer Chemotherapy.” Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 37, no. 1, BioMed Central, Nov. 2018, doi:10.1186/s13046-018-0909-x

VI. Arfin, Saniya, et al. “Oxidative Stress in Cancer Cell Metabolism.” Antioxidants, vol. 10, no. 5, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Apr. 2021, p. 642, doi:10.3390/antiox10050642

VII. Reczek, Colleen R., and Navdeep S. Chandel. “The Two Faces of Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer.” Annual Review of Cancer Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, Annual Reviews, Mar. 2017, pp. 79–98, doi:10.1146/annurev-cancerbio-041916-065808

VIII. Shi, Xiaoke, et al. “Reactive Oxygen Species in Cancer Stem Cells.” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 16, no. 11, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., June 2012, pp. 1215–28, doi:10.1089/ars.2012.4529

IX. Liu, Jiahui, and Zhichong Wang. “Increased Oxidative Stress as a Selective Anticancer Therapy.” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Jan. 2015, pp. 1–12, doi:10.1155/2015/294303

X. Zhang, Wei, et al. “Vitamin Intake and Liver Cancer Risk: A Report From Two Cohort Studies in China.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 104, no. 15, Oxford UP, July 2012, pp. 1174–82, doi:10.1093/jnci/djs277

XI. Omenn, Gilbert S., et al. “Effects of a Combination of Beta Carotene and Vitamin A on Lung Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease.” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 334, no. 18, Massachusetts Medical Society, May 1996, pp. 1150–55, doi:10.1056/nejm199605023341802

XII. Luo, Maochao, et al. “Antioxidant Therapy in Cancer: Rationale and Progress.” Antioxidants, vol. 11, no. 6, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, June 2022, p. 1128, doi:10.3390/antiox11061128

XIII. Nazarewicz, Ryszard, et al. “Does Scavenging of Mitochondrial Superoxide Attenuate Cancer Prosurvival Signaling Pathways?” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 19, no. 4, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., Aug. 2013, pp. 344–49, doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5185

XIV. Gal, Kristell Le, et al. “Mitochondria-Targeted Antioxidants MitoQ and MitoTEMPO Do Not Influence BRAF-Driven Malignant Melanoma and KRAS-Driven Lung Cancer Progression in Mice.” Antioxidants, vol. 10, no. 2, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Jan. 2021, p. 163, doi:10.3390/antiox10020163

Additional Files

Published

01-02-2024

How to Cite

Tara Bailkeri. (2024). BEYOND PATHOLOGIES: THE ROLE OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES IN CANCER PREVENTION AND TREATMENT IN HUMANS. International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(2). Retrieved from https://iejse.com/journals/index.php/iejse/article/view/67