MACHINE LEARNING ASSISTED OPTIMIZATION OF OXIDE NANOSTRUCTURES FOR RAPID AND SELECTIVE MULTI-GAS SENSING LIKE SNO2, NIO, NB2O3 OR NB2O5, ETC.

Authors

  • Sunny Sharma Research Scholar, Department of Physics, Phonics University, Roorkee

Keywords:

Metal Oxide Semiconductors (MOS), Chemiresistive Gas Sensing, Machine Learning-Assisted Gas Sensors, Sensor Drift Compensation, Gas Selectivity Enhancement, Edge AI Sensor Arrays

Abstract

Tin (IV) oxide (SnO2), Nickel (II) oxide (NiO), Niobium(V) oxide (Nb2O5) and Niobium (III) oxide (Nb2O3) are metal oxide semiconductor (MOS) nanostructures, which have thus far been at the heart of chemiresistive gas sensing due to their adjustable surface chemistry, high sensitivity, and ability to be microfabricated. Although heavily material-engineered, conventional MOS sensors typically lack cross-sensitivity, have low levels of inherent selectivity, have sluggish response-recovery kinetics, and drift in multi-gas conditions. Latest progress has demonstrated that the combination of machine learning (ML) and oxide nanostructured sensor arrays can greatly improve the performance of gas discrimination on complex atmospheres. As an example, more than 99 percent accuracy in classification of volatile organic compounds based on MOS sensor arrays when analyzed with a Random Forest and k-Nearest Neighbor algorithm, and deep learning methods have allowed detection of dangerous gases in real-time with very high accuracy. This is a critical review of the role of ML-assisted strategies in optimization in the form of supervised learning, feature engineering, dimensionality reduction and neural network structures in enhancing selectivity, drift compensation, and morphology-performance relationships in MOS sensors. This discussion points at the two issues, which include the lack of data and the interpretation of models, and research and development perspectives of self-calibration edge-AI-powered sensor arrays and physics-informed ML models transforming future gas sensing technologies.

References

I. Han, J., Li, H., Cheng, J., Ma, X., & Fu, Y. (2025). Advances in metal oxide semiconductor gas sensor arrays based on machine learning algorithms. Journal of Materials Chemistry C.

II. Chen, H., Chen, H., Chen, J., & Song, M. (2024). Gas sensors based on semiconductor metal oxides fabricated by electrospinning: A review. Sensors.

III. Fu, L., You, S., Li, G., Li, X., & Fan, Z. (2023). Application of semiconductor metal oxide in chemiresistive methane gas sensor: Recent developments and future perspectives. Molecules.

IV. Identification of H₂ and NH₃ gases using calorimetric signals and transient response through machine learning. (2026). Journal of Semiconductors.

V. Liu, H., Chu, R., & Tang, Z. (2015). Metal oxide gas sensor drift compensation using a two-dimensional classifier ensemble. Sensors.

VI. Liu, H., & Tang, Z. (2013). Metal oxide gas sensor drift compensation using a dynamic classifier ensemble based on fitting. Sensors.

VII. Singh, S., Sajana, S., Poornima, G., Adak, C., Shukla, R. P., & Kamble, V. (2023). Metal oxide-based gas sensor array for VOCs analysis in complex mixtures using machine learning. arXiv.

VIII. Yaqoob, U., & Younis, M. I. (2021). Chemical gas sensors: Recent developments, challenges, and the potential of machine learning—A review. Sensors.

IX. Dennler, N., Rastogi, S., Fonollosa, J., van Schaik, A., & Schmuker, M. (2021). Drift in a popular metal oxide sensor dataset reveals limitations for gas classification benchmarks. arXiv.

X. A comparative study of machine learning models for identifying noxious gases through thermal fingerprint measurements and MOS sensors. (2024). Sensors and Actuators A: Physical.

XI. Luo, W., Zheng, Y., Liu, Y., & Li, M. (2026). Identification of H₂ and NH₃ gases using calorimetric signals and transient response through machine learning. Journal of Semiconductors.

XII. Liu, F., Liu, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, Z., & Liu, Y. (2025). Machine learning-enhanced metal oxide gas sensor arrays: A review of selectivity and performance improvements. The Chemical Record.

XIII. Kim, T., Kim, Y., Cho, W., Kwak, J.-H., Cho, J., Pyeon, Y., Kim, J. J., & Shin, H. (2024). Ultralow-power single-sensor-based e-nose system powered by duty cycling and deep learning for real-time gas identification. arXiv.

XIV. Chen, Y., & Zhou, D. (2025). Metal oxide semiconductors for gas sensors: A comprehensive review of materials, mechanisms, and performance. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing.

XV. Chen, Y., Wang, L., & Hu, J. (2024). Recent progress in MOS gas sensor arrays and machine learning classification methods. Journal of Sensor Technology.

XVI. Djedidi, O., Djeziri, M. A., Morati, N., Seguin, J.-L., Bendahan, M., & Contaret, T. (2021). Gas sensing performance of MOS sensors under environmental variability. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

XVII. Yan, M., Chen, J., Wang, B., Li, B., Liu, H., Xu, W., & Cao, H. (2022). High-performance chemiresistive gas sensors based on nanostructured metal oxides: Materials, mechanisms, and applications. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

XVIII. Li, K., Wang, L., Chen, J., Yan, M., Fu, Y., & He, Q. (2021). Enhanced gas sensing via doped metal oxide nanostructures and pattern recognition algorithms. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.

XIX. Zheng, X., Zhang, T., & Liu, J. (2024). Effect of nanostructure morphology on MOS gas sensor performance. Journal of Nanomaterials.

XX. Song, Q., & Xu, J. (2024). Machine learning for drift compensation in metal oxide gas sensors. International Journal of Smart Sensor Systems.

XXI. Lu, H., Feng, L., Jiang, Z., & Li, X. (2025). Deep learning enabled selective gas detection with MOS sensor arrays. Journal of Advanced Sensor Networks.

XXII. Ren, G., & Wu, Y. (2023). PCA-based regression for gas concentration prediction in chemiresistive sensors. Measurement Science Review.

XXIII. Zhang, Y., & Huang, X. (2025). Feature extraction and classification in gas sensor arrays: Methods and applications. Journal of Electronic Materials.

XXIV. Wang, Y., & Zhao, Q. (2024). Neural network approaches for selectivity improvement of metal oxide gas sensors. IEEE Sensors Journal.

XXV. Lai, R., & Chen, Z. (2023). Dimensionality reduction techniques for gas sensor signal analysis. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

01-08-2026

How to Cite

Sunny Sharma. (2026). MACHINE LEARNING ASSISTED OPTIMIZATION OF OXIDE NANOSTRUCTURES FOR RAPID AND SELECTIVE MULTI-GAS SENSING LIKE SNO2, NIO, NB2O3 OR NB2O5, ETC. International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering, 9(08), 79–90. Retrieved from https://iejse.com/journals/index.php/iejse/article/view/426