SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF LIME, CRUSHED SAND, AND GEOFIBER ON STRENGTH AND BEARING CAPACITY OF EXPANSIVE SOILS

Authors

  • Sharanamma Patil Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sharnbasva University, Kalaburagi, India
  • B S Patil Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Sharnbasva University, Kalaburagi, India

Keywords:

Black Cotton Soil, Lime Stabilization, Crushed Sand, Geofiber, Unconfined Compressive Strength, California Bearing Ratio, Expansive Soil, Soil Stabilization, Pavement Subgrade

Abstract

Black cotton (BC) soil, a highly expansive clay prevalent across the Deccan Plateau of India, poses serious challenges in geotechnical and pavement engineering applications due to its high plasticity, low strength, and significant swelling–shrinkage behavior. The present study investigates a hybrid stabilization approach incorporating lime, crushed sand, and polypropylene geofiber to improve the engineering properties of BC soil. A comprehensive experimental work was conducted using varying proportions of lime (2–10%), crushed sand (5–40%), and geofiber (0.1–0.5%). Standard Proctor compaction tests, unconfined compressive strength (UCS) tests at 28 and 56 days of curing, and soaked California Bearing Ratio (CBR) tests were performed.

The results shows that increasing lime content reduces maximum dry density (MDD) while increasing optimum moisture content (OMC), attributed to flocculation–agglomeration and pozzolanic reactions. Significant improvement in strength characteristics was observed, with UCS increasing from 142 kPa for untreated soil to 1345 kPa at 28 days for an optimal mix of 6% lime, 15% crushed sand, and 0.3% geofiber, representing an enhancement of approximately 847%. The soaked CBR value improved from 1.8% to 28.5%, far exceeding the minimum requirement of 8% as per IRC: 37-2012 guidelines for subgrade materials.

The results confirm that the combined effect of chemical stabilization, granular modification, and fiber reinforcement produces a synergistic improvement in soil performance. The proposed ternary stabilization system offers a scalable, cost-effective, and sustainable solution for enhancing the load-bearing capacity and durability of expansive soils in pavement subgrade applications.

References

I. Utkarsh, A., & Jain, R. (2024). Synergistic stabilization of expansive soils using lime and fiber reinforcement. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.138756

II. Saha, P., Roy, S., & Ghosh, A. (2025). Fiber-reinforced soil stabilization: A review on strength and durability characteristics. Construction and Building Materials.

III. Khazaleh, S., Abu-Farsakh, M., & Chen, Q. (2023). Effect of sand addition on engineering properties of clay soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal.

IV. Mehmood, K., Ali, N., & Rehman, Z. (2026). Sustainable ground improvement techniques: Environmental impact assessment of chemical stabilizers. Journal of Cleaner Production.

V. Bhat, S. U. (2024). Hybrid soil stabilization techniques for sustainable infrastructure development. Environmental Geotechnics.

VI. Paul, A., Singh, D., & Sharma, R. (2025). Microstructural and mechanical behavior of stabilized expansive soils. Engineering Geology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.101762

VII. Ahmed, M., Khan, M., & Aziz, T. (2025). Synergistic effects of multi-additive stabilization in clayey soils. Soils and Foundations.

VIII. Syed, A., Rahman, M., & Karim, R. (2021). Review of traditional soil stabilization methods for clay soils. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

IX. Sambre, R., Patil, P., & Deshmukh, V. (2024). Performance of lime-fly ash stabilized expansive soils. Road Materials and Pavement Design.

X. Thatikonda, S., Rao, P., & Kumar, V. (2025). Utilization of waste PET fibers in soil stabilization. Materials Today: Proceedings.

XI. Bell FG (1996) Lime stabilization of clay minerals and soils. Eng Geol 42(4):223–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(96)00028-2

XII. Consoli NC, Prietto PDM, Ulbrich LA (1998) Influence of fiber and cement addition on behavior of sandy soil. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 124(12):1211–1214

XIII. Dash SK, Hussain M (2012) Lime stabilization of soils: reappraisal. J Mater Civ Eng 24(6):707–714

XIV. Ingles OG, Metcalf JB (1972) Soil stabilization: principles and practice. Butterworths, Sydney

XV. [Indian Roads Congress] IRC: 37-2012 (2012) Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. Indian Roads Congress, New Delhi

XVI. Maher MH, Ho YC (1993) Behavior of fiber-reinforced cemented sand under static and cyclic loads. Geotech Test J 16(3):330–338

XVII. Mitchell JK, Dermatas D (1990) Clay soil heave caused by lime–sulphate reactions. In: Durability and ageing of geosynthetics. ASTM International, Philadelphia, pp 41–64

XVIII. Ramesh HN, Manoj KV, Mamatha HK (2010) Compaction and strength behaviour of lime–coir fibre treated expansive soil. Geomech Eng 2(2):141–153

XIX. Sridharan A, Prakash K (2000) Expansive soil characterization: an appraisal. Geotech News 18(4):27–30

XX. Thyagaraj T, Sudhakar RR, Geetanjali J (2017) Osmotic flow and volume change behavior of lime-treated expansive soil. Int J Geomech 17(10):06017019

Additional Files

Published

01-06-2026

How to Cite

Sharanamma Patil, & B S Patil. (2026). SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF LIME, CRUSHED SAND, AND GEOFIBER ON STRENGTH AND BEARING CAPACITY OF EXPANSIVE SOILS. International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering, 9(05), 454–459. Retrieved from https://iejse.com/journals/index.php/iejse/article/view/365