A META-ANALYSIS OF THE NEURAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES IN ADOLESCENTS IN RISKY SITUATIONS

Authors

  • Benjamin Yin Research Scholars Program, Harvard Student Agencies, In collaboration with Learn with Leaders

Keywords:

Adolescence, Risky Behaviors, Decision-Making Processes, Neural Mechanisms, Peer Influence

Abstract

Adolescence is widely recognized as a critical developmental period, marked by significant psychological and neurocognitive changes. Neurocognitive developments, particularly in the prefrontal cortex, facilitate higher-order cognitive abilities and undergo rapid growth during this period. Understanding adolescent decision-making processes is crucial for several reasons. It provides insights into their unique developmental challenges and informs the design of interventions to mitigate risky behaviors affecting both individuals and the larger community. This meta-analysis investigates the neural mechanisms underlying adolescent risky-situation decision-making and finds commonalities, differences, and limitations in current research. Key insights include the common findings of activation in the middle frontal gyrus, ACC, and temporal regions.

References

I. Beyth-Marom, R., & Fischoff, B. (1997). Adolescents' decisions about risks: A cognitive perspective. In J. E. Schulenberg, J. Schulenberg, J. L. Maggs, & K. Hurrelmann (Eds.), Health Risks and Developmental Transitions During Adolescence (pp. 110-135). Cambridge University Press.

II. Chein, J., Albert, D., O'Brien, L., Uckert, K., & Steinberg, L. (2010, December 15). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14(2), F1-F10. National Library of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fj.1467-7687.2010.01035.x

III. Crone, E. A., & van Duijvenvoorde, A. C.K. (2021, December). Multiple pathways of risk taking in adolescence. Developmental Review, 62. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2021.100996

IV. Farah, M. J. (2018, June 1). Socioeconomic status and the brain: prospects for neuroscienceinformed policy. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 428-438. Scholarly Commons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0023-2

V. Fischhoff, B., Crowell, N. A., & Kipke, M. (Eds.). (1999). Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Prevention Programs: Summary of a Workshop. National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK224102/

VI. Gerhard, D. M., Meyer, H. C., & Lee, F. S. (2021, April 1). An Adolescent Sensitive Period for Threat Responding: Impacts of Stress and Sex. Biological Psychiatry, 89(7), 651-658. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.10.003

VII. Hartley, C. A., & Somerville, L. H. (2015, October). The neuroscience of adolescent decision-making. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 5, 108-115. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.09.004

VIII. Li, Z., Zhang, W., & Du, Y. (2023, December 4). Neural mechanisms of intertemporal and risky decision-making in individuals with internet use disorder: A perspective from directed functional connectivity. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 12(4), 907-919. AKJournals. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2023.00068

IX. Maslowsky, J., Owotomo, O., Huntley, E. D., & Keating, D. (2019, January 7). Adolescent risk behavior: Differentiating reasoned and reactive risk-taking. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 243-255. National Library of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10964-018-0978-3

X. Pei, R., Lauharatanahirun, N., Cascio, C. N., O'Donnell, M. B., Shope, J. T., Simons-Morton, B. G., Vettel, J. M., & Falk, E. B. (2020, May 7). Neural processes during adolescent risky decision making are associated with conformity to peer influence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 44. National Library of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.dcn.2020.100794

XI. Ravindranath, O., Perica, M. I., Parr, A. C., Ojha, A., McKeon, S. D., Montano, G., Ullendorff, N., Luna, B., & Edmiston, E. K. (2024, February 12). Adolescent neurocognitive development and decision-making abilities regarding gender-affirming care. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101351

XII. Rodrigo, M. J., Padron, I., de Vega, M., & Ferstl, E. C. (2014, February 14). Adolescents’ risky decision-making activates neural networks related to social cognition and cognitive control processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00060

XIII. Roediger III, H. L., & Pyc, M. A. (2012, September 2). Inexpensive techniques to improve education: Applying cognitive psychology to enhance educational practice. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 1(4), 242-248. American Psychological Association. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jarmac.2012.09.002

XIV. Singh, V., Kumar, A., & Gupta, S. (2022, July 26). Mental Health Prevention and Promotion—A Narrative Review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. National Library of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.898009

XV. Thomas, M. S. C., Ansari, D., & Knowland, V. C.P. (2018, October 22). Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(4), 477-492. The Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12973

Additional Files

Published

01-09-2024

How to Cite

Benjamin Yin. (2024). A META-ANALYSIS OF THE NEURAL MECHANISMS UNDERLYING DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES IN ADOLESCENTS IN RISKY SITUATIONS. International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(9). Retrieved from https://iejse.com/journals/index.php/iejse/article/view/136