IMPACTS OF THE GLOBAL (KUNMING-MONTREAL) BIODIVERSITY FRAMEWORK ON DIFFERENT COUNTRIES WITH A FOCUS ON INDIA
Keywords:
Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework, Biodiversity Conservation, Policy Changes, Sustainable Practices, International CooperationAbstract
The Kunming-Montreal Biodiversity Framework, adopted at the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP15) to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), aims to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030. This paper evaluates the framework's impacts on biodiversity conservation efforts, with a particular focus on India. Through comprehensive analysis of secondary data, including literature reviews, reports, policy documents, and detailed case studies from various countries, the study examines how the framework's implementation influences policy changes and sustainable practices. The findings highlight significant progress in developed countries, leveraging substantial financial resources, advanced technologies, and strong institutional frameworks. In contrast, developing countries, including India, face financial constraints, limited technical expertise, and competing socio-economic priorities. Despite these challenges, India has demonstrated innovation in expanding protected areas, integrating biodiversity into national policies, and engaging local communities in conservation efforts. The study underscores the necessity of enhanced international cooperation, financial support, and capacity-building to bridge existing disparities and achieve the framework's ambitious goals.
References
I. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2010). Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020, including Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/sp
II. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2020). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
III. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). (2024). Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. https://www.cbd.int/gbf
IV. Díaz, S., Settele, J., Brondízio, E. S., Ngo, H. T., Agard, J., Arneth, A., Balvanera, P., Brauman, K. A., Butchart, S. H. M., Chan, K. M. A., Garibaldi, L. A., Ichii, K., Liu, J., Subramanian, S. M., Midgley, G. F., Miloslavich, P., Molnár, Z., Obura, D., Pfaff, A., Polasky, S., ... Zayas, C. N. (2019). Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science, 366(6471), eaax3100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3100
V. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2019). The state of the world’s biodiversity for food and agriculture. FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture Assessments.
VI. Global Tiger Initiative Secretariat. (2010). Global Tiger Recovery Program 2010-2022. Retrieved from https://globaltigerinitiative.org/
VII. Gonçalves, E. (2023). Marine Protected Areas as Tools for Ocean Sustainability. 10.1007/978-3-031-24888-7_11.
VIII. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). (2019). Biodiversity and Climate Change: Scientific Assessments. IPBES.
IX. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). (2019). Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Retrieved from https://ipbes.net/global-assessment
X. King, S., Vardon, M., Grantham, H., Eigenraam, M., Ferrier, S., Juhn, D., Larsen, T., Brown, C., & Turner, R. (2021). Linking biodiversity into national economic accounting. Environmental Science & Policy, 116, 20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.10.020
XI. NACSO. (2019). The State of Community Conservation in Namibia – A Review of Communal Conservancies, Community Forests and Other CBNRM Initiatives (2018 Annual Report). Windhoek, Namibia: NACSO.
XII. Otero, I., Farrell, K., Pueyo, S., Kallis, G., Kehoe, L., Haberl, H., Plutzar, C., Hobson, P., García Márquez, J., Rodríguez-Labajos, B., Martin, J., Erb, K., Schindler, S., Nielsen, J., Skorin, T., Settele, J., Essl, F., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Brotons, L. (2022). Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth. 10.18452/24122.
XIII. Pagiola, S. (2008). Payment for Environmental Services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 65, 712-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033
XIV. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2020). Global Biodiversity Outlook 5. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/gbo5
XV. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. (2022). The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/article/2022-GBF
XVI. Swaisgood, R., Wei, F., Wildt, D., Kouba, A., & Zhang, Z. (2009). Giant panda conservation science: How far we have come. Biology Letters, 6, 143-145. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2009.0786
XVII. United Nations. (2022). The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/resources/kunming-montreal-global-biodiversity-framework
XVIII. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2020). Achieving the 2030 Agenda through biodiversity mainstreaming. UNEP.
XIX. United Nations Environment Programme. (2021). The Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework: Draft 1. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/6b53/c6b8/3613f74d7c10445fbb0e87db/wg2020-03-03-en.pdf
XX. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, & NGS. (2020). Protected Planet Report 2020. Retrieved from https://www.unep.org/resources/protected-planet-report-2020
XXI. Visconti, P., Butchart, S. H. M., Brooks, T. M., Langhammer, P. F., Marnewick, D., Vergara, S., Yanosky, A., & Watson, J. E. M. (2019). Protected area targets post-2020. Science, 364(6437), 239-241. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav6886
XXII. Waldron, A., Adams, V., Allan, J., Arnell, A., Palacios Abrantes, J., Asner, G., Atkinson, S., Baccini, A., Baillie, J., Balmford, A., Austin, J., Brander, L., Brondízio, E., Bruner, A., Burkart, K., Butchart, S., Button, R., Zhang, Y. (2020). Protecting 30 percent of the planet: Costs, benefits and economic implications. 10.13140/RG.2.2.19950.64327.
XXIII. World Wildlife Fund (WWF). (2020). Living Planet Report 2020: Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss. Retrieved from https://www.worldwildlife.org/
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.