AN APPROACH OF CHECKING GRAMMAR FOR TELUGU LANGUAGE COMPLEX SENTENCES

Dr. V Suresh

Authors

Dr. V Suresh Associate Professor, Department of Information Technology, Anil Neerukonda Institute of Technology and Sciences, Visakhapatnam, India

Keywords:

Dependent Clause, Divide and Conquer, Adverb Clause, Noun Phrase, Verb Phrase

Abstract

For grammar checking of complex sentences, it is necessary to identify the structure of these sentences. The structure of complex sentences can be identified on the basis of number of clauses and types of clauses present in them. If a sentence contains a dependent clause along with independent clause then it is a complex sentence. Once the sentence is identified as complex sentence, the next step is to identify its pattern. After identification of patterns, various clauses present in the sentence are extracted and grammar checking is performed on them. A grammar checking system for complex sentences of Telugu language has been done with grammatical error detection and correction. This research work on grammar checking of complex sentences is based on the assumption that the input sentences will be in Telugu script.

References

I. Bustamante, F. R., & Le6n, F. S. 1996. GramCheck: A grammar and style checker. In Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 175-181

II. Bharati, A., Chaitanya, V., Sangal, R., & Ramakrishnamacharyulu, K. V. 1995. Natural language processing: a Paninian perspective. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India. pp. 65-106.

III. Bigert, J., Kann, V., Knutsson, O., & Sjobergh, J. 2004. Grammar checking for Swedish second language learners. pp. 33-47.

IV. Sanjeev kumar Sharma, G.S Lehel ‘Identification of Compound Sentences in Punjabi Language’ Research Cell: An International Journal of Engineering Sciences, InauguralIssue2010ISSN: 2229-6913 (Print), ISSN: 2320-0332 (Online) Vol. 1, pp. 1-8.

V. Carlberger, J., Domeij, R., Kann, V., & Knutsson, O. 2004. The development and performance of a grammar checker for Swedish: A language engineering perspective. Natural language engineering, 1(1).

VI. Beesley, K. R. 2001. Finite-state morphological analysis and generation of Arabic at Xerox Research: Status and plans in 2001. In ACL Workshop on Arabic Language Processing: Status and Perspective Vol. 1, pp. 1-8.

VII. Chidambaram, D. 2005. Processing complex sentences for information extraction. A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science.

VIII. Ehsan, N., & Faili, H. 2010. Towards grammar checker development for Persian language. IEEE International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering (NLP-KE), 2010. pp. 1-8

IX. Fernandes, E. R., Pires, B., dos Santos, C. N., & Milidiiu, R. L. 2009. Clause identification using entropy guided transformation learning. IEEE 2009 Seventh Brazilian Symposium in Gill, M. S., Lehal, G. S., & Joshi, S. S. 2009. Part of speech tagging for grammar checking of Punjabi. The Linguistic Journal, 4(1), pp. 6-21.

X. Information and Human Language Technology (STIL), pp. 117-124.

XI. Hein, A. S. 1998. A Chart-Based Framework for Grammar Checking Initial Studies. In Proc. of 11 th Nordic Conference in Computational Linguistic. pp. 68-80.

XII. Jurafsky, Daniel and James H. Martin. 2000. Speech and Language Processing: An Introduction to Natural language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition. Pearson Education, Delhi, India

XIII. Kubon, V., & Platek, M. 1994. A grammar based approach to a grammar checking of free word order languages. In Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2. Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 906-910

XIV. Naber, D. 2003. A rule-based style and grammar checker. Thesis, Technical Faculty, University of Bielefeld, Germany

XV. http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telugu_language

XVI. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telugu_grammar