PEN MODEL OF TEACHING LEARNING: NEEDS AND SIGNIFICANCE IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE

Authors

  • Dipti Ranjan Rout Faculty in Education, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack

Keywords:

Pen Model, Secondary School, Teaching Blearning Process

Abstract

The present study was an attempt to develope learning in physical science of secondary schools under CBSE board. The goal of education is not to increase the amount of knowledge, but to create the possibilities of a child to invent and discover and to prepare the pupil to face challenges and keep pace with the advancements of science. Indeed, the task of teaching science at the school level is now more complex than ever before since its excitement and diverse possibilities must now be infused into the young minds in an appropriate, dynamically evolving way. The PEN model consists of 3 phases (project base learning, experimental learning and experiential learning). Each phase is consisting of 3 steps and the 9 steps are educe, entice, examine, engage, explore, explain, elaborate, evaluate and extend. It is a pure or fundamental research. The population of this study was the whole NEP 2020 report and all the textbooks of secondary schools under CBSE board. The sample consists of the science textbook of class IX and its first chapter named as matters in our surrounding, the page no 4,5,8,12 of NEP 2020 report. The research uses the format of smart lesson plan and NCERT science textbook as tool to conduct the study. The qualitative data collection was done for this study. This demands that the entire game of teaching science has to change from its conventionality. Moreover, in the world of today where knowledge is being multiplied exponentially, Science education will not be able to justify itself by remaining merely contented with the objective of imparting a certain quantum of scientific knowledge, however large be the quantum. Since the rate at which knowledge gets obsolete is very high and therefore it is essential that the emphasis of science education should be on the development of abilities and disposition of mind rather than merely the transfer of dead subject matter.

References

I. Akcay, B. B. (2013). Entomology: Promoting Creativity in the Science Lab. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 50(2),49-53.

II. Campbell, T. C. (1977). An evaluation of a learning cycle intervention strategy for enhancing the use of formal operational thought by beginning college physics students. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 38(7), 3903.

III. Hu,W., Wu,B., Jia,X., Yi, X.,Duan, C., & Aufman, J.C.(2013) Increasing Students' Scientific Creativity: The “Learn to Think” Intervention Program. The Journal of Creative Behavior (2013, 47(1,) 3–21). Retrieved from doi: 10.1002/jocb.20.

IV. Kinqir, S., & Akqemeir, E. (2013). Using the learning cycle method to improve college students understanding of gases concepts. European Educational Research Association, 2013

V. Aggarwal, S., & Yadav, S. (2013). Learning style preference of prospective teachers with regard to their gender and stream. BRICS Journal of Educational Research,3(1), 30-34.

VI. Allen, K. Scheve, J., & Nieter, V. (2012). Understanding learning styles making a difference for diverse learners.5301 Oceanus Drive Huntington Beach, CA 92649-1030: Shell Educational Publishing, Inc.

VII. Ayob, A. (2014). The integration of multimedia hypertext and interactive text: its effect on achievement in comprehension. Journal of Advances in Information Technology. 5(2), 48-52. doi: 10.4304/jait.5.2.48-52

VIII. Bansal, J., & Garg, T. (2010). Learning and thinking styles of visually impaired children. Experiments in Education, 38(4), 7-12 Biber, Ç., Tuna, A., & Korkmaz, S. (2013). The mistakes and the misconceptions of the eighth-grade students on the subject of angles. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 50-59. Retrieved from http:// scimath.net/articles/12/122.pdf

IX. Birisci, S., & Karal, H. (2013). Student perceptions about group-based problem-solving process in online and in-class settings. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education,4(3). doi:10.16949/turcomat.06646

X. Brunton, B. (2015). Learning styles and student performance in introductory Economics. Journal of Education for Business, 90 (2), 89-95. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/ doi/abs/10.1080/08832323.2014.980716

XI. Çolak, E. (2015). The Effect of cooperative learning on the learning approaches of students with different learning styles. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 59, 17-34. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ1070614)

XII. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational Research- planning, conducting and evaluating– quantitative and qualitative research. New Delhi: PHI Learning Private Limited.

XIII. Gencel, I.E. (2015). Learning styles and problem solving skills of Turkish prospective teachers. International Journal of Progressive education, 1(2),Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ1062878)

XIV. Gibson, D. J., Congdon, E.L., & Levine, S.C. (2015). The effects of word-learning biases on children's concept of angle. Child Development, 86 (1), 319-326. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ1052235)

XV. Gök.G., Vural, S. S., & Öztekin, C. (2014). The effect of 7E-learning cycle instruction on middle school students’ conceptual understanding of respiratory system. Conference: ECER 2014, The Past, the Present and the Future of Educational ResearchNetwork:21. Emerging Researchers' Group (presented at Emerging Researchers' Conference). Retrieved from http:// www.eera-ecer.de/ecer-programmes/pdf/conference/19/contribution/31253/

XVI. Hernandez, T. T., & Roleda, L.S. (2015). The effectiveness of using 7E- learning cycle model in the learning achievement of grade 8. Presented at the DLSU Research Congress 2015 De La Salle University, Manila, Philippines March 2-4, 2015 Retrieved from http://www.dlsu.edu.ph/conferences/ dlsu_research_ congress/2015/grc/GRC-I-002.pdf

XVII. Kirthika, S. M., & Saroja, M.M. ( 2014). Achievement in Mathematics of standard IX students in relation to their logical mathematical intelligence. Journal of Educational Research & Extension, 51(4), 42-52.

XVIII. Kurniawan, Y., & Suhandi, A. (2015). The three tier-test for identification the quantity of students’ misconception on Newton’s first laws. Full Paper Proceeding GTAR-2015,2, 313-

XIX. 319. Retrieved from http://www. globalilluminators.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2015/05/GTAR- 15-250.pdf

XX. Kusat, Y., & Ozlem, K. (2015). Investigation of the relationship between the spatial visualization success and visual/spatial intelligence capabilities of sixth grade Students. International Journal of Instruction, 8(1), 189-204.Retrieved fromhttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ EJ1085286.pdf

XXI. Lakshmi, A. V., & Jyothi, M.N. (2014). A study on need for achievement of X class students in relation to achievement in Mathematics. Journal of Educational Research and Extension, 51 ( 3),64-71.

XXII. Lee, B. (2015). EFL Learners' Perspectives on ELT materials evaluation relative to learning styles. RELC Journal: A Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 46(2), 147- 163. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ1071842)

Additional Files

Published

01-03-2024

How to Cite

Dipti Ranjan Rout. (2024). PEN MODEL OF TEACHING LEARNING: NEEDS AND SIGNIFICANCE IN PHYSICAL SCIENCE. International Educational Journal of Science and Engineering, 7(3). Retrieved from https://iejse.com/journals/index.php/iejse/article/view/107